test

Evans SW, Beal J, Berger K, et al. (2020) Embrace experimentation in biosecurity governance. Science 368(6487): 138–140. DOI: 10.1126/science.aba2932.
Jasanoff S (1997) Civilization and madness: the great BSE scare of 1996. Public Understanding of Science 6(3): 221–232. DOI: 10.1088/0963-6625/6/3/002.
Arjini N (2020) Science Will Not Come on a White Horse With a Solution. The Nation, 6 April. Available at: https://www.thenation.com/article/society/sheila-jasanoff-interview-coronavirus/ (accessed 7 April 2020).
Jasanoff S (2018) Just transitions: A humble approach to global energy futures. Energy Research & Social Science 35. Energy and the Future: 11–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.11.025.
Jasanoff S (2016) Power of technology. In: The Ethics of Invention: Technology and the Human Future. First edition. Norton global ethics series. New York: WWNorton & Company, pp. 1–30.
Jasanoff S (2007) Bhopal’s Trials of Knowledge and Ignorance. Isis 98(2): 344–350. DOI: 10.1086/518194.
Jasanoff S (2014) In: Hommels A, Mesman J, and Bijker WE (eds) Vulnerability in Technological Cultures: New Directions in Research and Governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jasanoff S (1994) Introduction. In: Jasanoff S (ed.) Learning from Disaster: Risk Management after Bhopal. Law in social context series. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 1–21.
Jasanoff S (ed.) (1994) Learning from Disaster: Risk Management after Bhopal. Law in social context series. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Barnhill-Dilling SK and Delborne JA (2019) The genetically engineered American chestnut tree as opportunity for reciprocal restoration in Haudenosaunee communities. Biological Conservation 232: 1–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.018.
Stirling A, Hayes KR and Delborne J (2018) Towards inclusive social appraisal: risk, participation and democracy in governance of synthetic biology. BMC Proceedings 12(8): 15. DOI: 10.1186/s12919-018-0111-3.
Kokotovich AE, Delborne JA, Elsensohn J, et al. (2020) Emerging Technologies for Invasive Insects: The Role of Engagement. Annals of the Entomological Society of America. DOI: 10.1093/aesa/saz064.
Daly HE, Czech B, Trauger DL, et al. (2007) Are We Consuming Too Much: For What? Conservation Biology 21(5): 1359–1362. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4620961 (accessed 18 March 2020).
Gardiner SM (2006) A Perfect Moral Storm: Climate Change, Intergenerational Ethics and the Problem of Moral Corruption. Environmental Values 15(3): 397–413. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/30302196 (accessed 18 March 2020).
Hardin G (1968) The Tragedy of the Commons. Science 162(3859): 1243–1248. DOI: 10.1126/science.162.3859.1243.
Hafer N, Vos CJ, McAllister K, et al. (2009) How Scientists View Law Enforcement. Science Progress February.
Millett P, Binz T, Evans SW, et al. (2019) Developing a Comprehensive, Adaptive, and International Biosafety and Biosecurity Program for Advanced Biotechnology: The iGEM Experience. Applied Biosafety 24(2): 64–71. DOI: 10.1177/1535676019838075.
IoM (Institute of Medicine) and NRC (National Research Council) (2006) Globalization, Biosecurity, and the Future of the Life Sciences. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. DOI: 10.17226/11567.
United States and Trump DJ (2017) National Security Strategy of the United States. The White House.
Jasanoff S (2017) Science and Democracy. In: Felt U, Smith-Doerr L, Miller CA, et al. (eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. 4th ed. MIT Press, pp. 259–287.
Moritz RL, Berger KM, Owen BR, et al. (2020) Promoting biosecurity by professionalizing biosecurity. Science 367(6480): 856–858. DOI: 10.1126/science.aba0376.
iGEM (international Genetically Engineered Machines) (2017) Gene Drive Policy. Available at: http://2017.igem.org/Safety/Policies (accessed 8 March 2020).
Poel I van de, Mehos DC and Asveld L (2018) Introduction. In: Poel I van de, Asveld L, and Mehos DC (eds) New Perspectives on Technology in Society: Experimentation beyond the Laboratory. Emerging technologies, ethics and international affairs. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY: Routledge, an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group.
Poel I van de, Asveld L and Mehos DC (eds) (2018) New Perspectives on Technology in Society: Experimentation beyond the Laboratory. Emerging technologies, ethics and international affairs. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY: Routledge, an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group.
NSABB (National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity) (2020) NIH VideoCast - National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity - January 2020 (Day 1). Available at: https://videocast.nih.gov/summary.asp?live=35665&bhcp=1 (accessed 6 March 2020).
Powell K (2020) Behind the scenes in the biosafety office. Nature 579(7797): 159–161. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-020-00593-5.
Laurent B (2016) Political experiments that matter: Ordering democracy from experimental sites. Social Studies of Science 46(5): 773–794. DOI: 10.1177/0306312716668587.
Monsees L (2019) Public relations: Theorizing the contestation of security technology. Security Dialogue 50(6): 531–546. DOI: 10.1177/0967010619870364.
Walton SA (2010) State Building through Building for the State: Foreign and Domestic Expertise in Tudor Fortification. Osiris 25(1): 66–84. DOI: 10.1086/657263.
Ash EH (2010) Introduction: Expertise and the Early Modern State. Osiris 25(1): 1–24. DOI: 10.1086/657254.
Prins G, Galiana I, Green C, et al. (2010) The Hartwell Paper: A New Direction for Climate Policy after the Crash of 2009. Institute for Science, Innovation, and Society, University of Oxford.
Tangney P (2019) Between conflation and denial – the politics of climate expertise in Australia. Australian Journal of Political Science. DOI: 10.1080/10361146.2018.1551482.
Pielke Jr RA (2015) I am Under “Investigation”. Available at: https://theclimatefix.wordpress.com/2015/02/25/i-am-under-investigation/ (accessed 25 February 2020).
Curry J (2015) A new low in science: Criminalizing climate change skeptics. Available at: https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/a-new-low-in-science-criminalizing-climate-change-skeptics (accessed 25 February 2020).
Jones MS, Delborne JA, Elsensohn J, et al. (2019) Does the U.S. public support using gene drives in agriculture? And what do they want to know? Science Advances 5(9). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aau8462.
McNamara JH (2014) Bridging gaps in synthetic biology oversight : iGEM as a testbed for proactive, adaptive risk management. Thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Available at: https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/90057 (accessed 20 February 2020).
McNamara J, Lightfoot SB-Y, Drinkwater K, et al. (2014) Designing Safety Policies to Meet Evolving Needs: iGEM as a Testbed for Proactive and Adaptive Risk Management. ACS Synthetic Biology 3(12): 983–985. DOI: 10.1021/sb500058e.
Evans SW, Leese M and Rychnovská D (n.d.) Science, technology, and security: towards critical collaboration.
Kemp L, Aldridge L, Booy O, et al. (n.d.) 80 Questions for UK Biological Security.
Evans SW, Beal J, Berger K, et al. (n.d.) Experimentation in Biosecurity Governance.
Nunes J (2013) Security, Emancipation and the Politics of Health: A New Theoretical Perspective. London: Routledge. Available at: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/harvard-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1434056 (accessed 16 February 2020).
ProQuest Ebook Central - Detail page (n.d.). Available at: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezp-prod1.hul.harvard.edu/lib/harvard-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1434056 (accessed 16 February 2020).
Mena CF, Arsel M, Pellegrini L, et al. (2019) Community-Based Monitoring of Oil Extraction: Lessons Learned in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Society & Natural Resources. DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2019.1688441.
Ludwig D and Macnaghten P (2020) Traditional ecological knowledge in innovation governance: a framework for responsible and just innovation. Journal of Responsible Innovation 7(1): 26–44. DOI: 10.1080/23299460.2019.1676686.
Stilgoe J (2016) Scientific advice on the move: the UK mobile phone risk issue as a public experiment. Palgrave Communications 2(1): 1–9. DOI: 10.1057/palcomms.2016.28.
Brooks H (2001) Autonomous Science and Socially Responsive Science: A Search for Resolution. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 26(1): 29–48. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.energy.26.1.29.
Pielke Jr RA (2004) When scientists politicize science: making sense of controversy over The Skeptical Environmentalist. Environmental Science & Policy 7(5). Science, Policy, and Politics: Learning from Controversy Over The Skeptical Environmentalist: 405–417. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.004.
Sismondo S (2008) Science and Technology Studies and an Engaged Program. In: Hackett EJ, Amsterdamska O, Lynch M, et al. (eds) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. 3rd ed. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 13–31.
Ravetz JR (1971) Scientific Knowledge and Its Social Problems. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Woolgar S (2004) What happened to provocation in science and technology studies? History and Technology 20(4): 339–349. DOI: 10.1080/0734151042000304321.