Contact

If you would like to contact me, please use the form below.

Name(required)

Email(required)

Comment(required)

Δ

Poel I van de, Mehos DC and Asveld L (2018) Introduction. In: Poel I van de, Asveld L, and Mehos DC (eds) New Perspectives on Technology in Society: Experimentation beyond the Laboratory. Emerging technologies, ethics and international affairs. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY: Routledge, an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group.

Poel I van de, Asveld L and Mehos DC (eds) (2018) New Perspectives on Technology in Society: Experimentation beyond the Laboratory. Emerging technologies, ethics and international affairs. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY: Routledge, an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group.

NSABB (National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity) (2020) NIH VideoCast - National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity - January 2020 (Day 1). Available at: https://videocast.nih.gov/summary.asp?live=35665&bhcp=1 (accessed 6 March 2020).

Powell K (2020) Behind the scenes in the biosafety office. Nature 579(7797): 159–161. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-020-00593-5.

Laurent B (2016) Political experiments that matter: Ordering democracy from experimental sites. Social Studies of Science 46(5): 773–794. DOI: 10.1177/0306312716668587.

Monsees L (2019) Public relations: Theorizing the contestation of security technology. Security Dialogue 50(6): 531–546. DOI: 10.1177/0967010619870364.

Walton SA (2010) State Building through Building for the State: Foreign and Domestic Expertise in Tudor Fortification. Osiris 25(1): 66–84. DOI: 10.1086/657263.

Ash EH (2010) Introduction: Expertise and the Early Modern State. Osiris 25(1): 1–24. DOI: 10.1086/657254.

Prins G, Galiana I, Green C, et al. (2010) The Hartwell Paper: A New Direction for Climate Policy after the Crash of 2009. Institute for Science, Innovation, and Society, University of Oxford.

Tangney P (2019) Between conflation and denial – the politics of climate expertise in Australia. Australian Journal of Political Science. DOI: 10.1080/10361146.2018.1551482.

Pielke Jr RA (2015) I am Under “Investigation”. Available at: https://theclimatefix.wordpress.com/2015/02/25/i-am-under-investigation/ (accessed 25 February 2020).

Curry J (2015) A new low in science: Criminalizing climate change skeptics. Available at: https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/a-new-low-in-science-criminalizing-climate-change-skeptics (accessed 25 February 2020).

Jones MS, Delborne JA, Elsensohn J, et al. (2019) Does the U.S. public support using gene drives in agriculture? And what do they want to know? Science Advances 5(9). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aau8462.

McNamara JH (2014) Bridging gaps in synthetic biology oversight : iGEM as a testbed for proactive, adaptive risk management. Thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Available at: https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/90057 (accessed 20 February 2020).

McNamara J, Lightfoot SB-Y, Drinkwater K, et al. (2014) Designing Safety Policies to Meet Evolving Needs: iGEM as a Testbed for Proactive and Adaptive Risk Management. ACS Synthetic Biology 3(12): 983–985. DOI: 10.1021/sb500058e.

Evans SW, Leese M and Rychnovská D (n.d.) Science, technology, and security: towards critical collaboration.

Kemp L, Aldridge L, Booy O, et al. (n.d.) 80 Questions for UK Biological Security.

Evans SW, Beal J, Berger K, et al. (n.d.) Experimentation in Biosecurity Governance.

Nunes J (2013) Security, Emancipation and the Politics of Health: A New Theoretical Perspective. London: Routledge. Available at: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/harvard-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1434056 (accessed 16 February 2020).

ProQuest Ebook Central - Detail page (n.d.). Available at: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezp-prod1.hul.harvard.edu/lib/harvard-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1434056 (accessed 16 February 2020).

Mena CF, Arsel M, Pellegrini L, et al. (2019) Community-Based Monitoring of Oil Extraction: Lessons Learned in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Society & Natural Resources. DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2019.1688441.

Ludwig D and Macnaghten P (2020) Traditional ecological knowledge in innovation governance: a framework for responsible and just innovation. Journal of Responsible Innovation 7(1): 26–44. DOI: 10.1080/23299460.2019.1676686.

Stilgoe J (2016) Scientific advice on the move: the UK mobile phone risk issue as a public experiment. Palgrave Communications 2(1): 1–9. DOI: 10.1057/palcomms.2016.28.

Brooks H (2001) Autonomous Science and Socially Responsive Science: A Search for Resolution. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 26(1): 29–48. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.energy.26.1.29.

Pielke Jr RA (2004) When scientists politicize science: making sense of controversy over The Skeptical Environmentalist. Environmental Science & Policy 7(5). Science, Policy, and Politics: Learning from Controversy Over The Skeptical Environmentalist: 405–417. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.004.

Sismondo S (2008) Science and Technology Studies and an Engaged Program. In: Hackett EJ, Amsterdamska O, Lynch M, et al. (eds) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. 3rd ed. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 13–31.

Ravetz JR (1971) Scientific Knowledge and Its Social Problems. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Woolgar S (2004) What happened to provocation in science and technology studies? History and Technology 20(4): 339–349. DOI: 10.1080/0734151042000304321.

View my Zotero reference library to see a complete list of articles I work with.

Search this site

Search for...

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you accept this policy as long as you are using this websiteXAccept View Policy

Send to Email Address Your Name Your Email Address

Cancel

Post was not sent - check your email addresses!

Email check failed, please try again

Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.

Contact

Share this: